Mason school consolidation site tests delivered with a disclaimer
July 28, 1998
Gazette Online
By Tara Tuckwiller
STAFF WRITER
POINT PLEASANT - No toxic waste appears to be contaminating the
Mason County consolidated high school site, the head of a private testing firm
told school board members Monday.
The results came with a disclaimer, though.
"We didn't sample for anything and everything," said Ron
Potesta, head of Potesta and Associates of Charleston. "There may be something
we missed."
The county paid Potesta $12,750 to test the school site's soil
and groundwater after parents raised an alarm in April, when state environmental
officials said the 65-acre field might be contaminated with toxic waste.
School board members - some of whom have since been voted out
of office - had just voted to abandon a site the county already owned and buy
the new site for $650,000 from a group of local businessmen.
They planned to close Wahama, Hannan and Point Pleasant high
schools, and build a $15 million, 1,400-student county high school on the land
north of Point Pleasant.
The land was part of a Superfund environmental cleanup site
until four years ago, and toxic waste left over from a World War II explosives
factory still contaminates the land and groundwater nearby.
The property was also used as a state agriculture test station
for years, and parents became concerned that DDT and other pesticide residues
may still contaminate the land.
Potesta didn't test for some of those chemicals, board member
Shirley Gue noted. Gue has led other Mason County parents in fighting
consolidation for three years.
"There's a known contaminant list from the Department of
Defense. Arsenic, etc.," Gue said. "None of those things were tested?"
"That's correct," said Potesta engineer Dave Carpenter.
Carpenter said he just tested for what he expected to find,
based on the memories of people who worked on the property and advice from some
West Virginia University professors.
No written logs could be found for WVU's 30 years of
agricultural tests, Potesta said. The man who ran the test station for 10 years
said he may have some records of what chemicals he used, but he couldn't lay his
hands on them just now.
Another man who had farmed the property said he had records of
the chemicals he used, but he wouldn't let Carpenter see them.
"Most of them were referring to their memory, not exact logs,"
Potesta said.
"That's what concerns me," Gue said.
Potesta said he found no trace of the explosive
trinitrotolulene (TNT), which contaminates the groundwater on the nearby
Superfund site. He didn't find any residues from the pesticides and herbicides
people remembered using on the field, either.
Potesta based his findings on 20 soil samples and a surface
water sample from a drainage ditch that flows onto the property from the
direction of the old explosives plant.
In wet weather, water from the ditch pools in the middle of the
field and slowly seeps into the ground. In dry weather, a local farmer says the
water in that ditch runs red, Carpenter said.
"That could be natural high iron in the soil. It could be
biological activity," Carpenter said. "I never saw anything stained red in the
ditch."
Local residents are still fighting the consolidation plan with
a lawsuit, which is currently making its way through Mason County Circuit Court.
Since anti-consolidation members took over the county school board in July,
those residents have gained confidence.
"Won't make any difference," whispered consolidation foe
Clifford Oliver, as Potesta and Carpenter prepared to make their presentation to
the school board. "There ain't gonna be a school down there."
To contact staff writer Tara Tuckwiller, call
348-5189.